For my AirCon Controller design, I simplified the controls into three distinct sections. I made the left side of the application primarily for system status and prominent controls such as temperature control and power. The other two sections, “Control” and “Zones”, feature secondary and more refined controls for the air-conditioner. The “Control” section allows changes to mode and fan speed, while the “Zones” section provides the ability to target and manage flow to each specific room. These sections use subtle animations that are particularly evident for fan speed that brings the interface to life and depict specific changes to the system. The use of colour throughout the interface also informs the user of the currently selected mode, whether that be “Cool”, “Heat”, or “Fan”.

From looking at current air-conditioner applications, I found many not only lacked a modern interface but lacked consideration for the end-user who may feel overwhelmed by many controls, different menus and jargon. To show the complexity, I looked at one application and generated a journey map detailing the process of changing the airflow in a zone or room then adjusting the main temperature degrees. The chosen example had a very long journey specifically because you are jumping between multiple menus to complete simple tasks. I ensured this process was simplified for my design by providing users with minimal menus to avoid getting lost and an overview of the system that includes controls to the most important functions. As a result, the task was completed with my design in four interaction points compared to the other application, which took seven points of interaction.